The conflict in Iran remains at the forefront of investors’ attention, and market sentiment is likely to continue to be tied to developments in the Middle East. Despite a willingness from both sides to negotiate, a more comprehensive resolution has thus far been elusive. As a result, uncertainty surrounding the conflict’s trajectory and its impact on global energy markets continues to add another layer of complexity to an already challenging macroeconomic environment. The primary macroeconomic risk stems from the possibility of a prolonged disruption to energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint through which roughly 20% of global oil supply passes. While we expect tensions to moderate over time, the pace of de-escalation will be a key variable for structural energy market pricing.
Despite these risks, our macroeconomic outlook remains relatively optimistic, with risks tilted to the downside. The U.S. economy is central to our global outlook in 2026. We believe it will be able to absorb elevated energy prices, in line with what we observed in 2023 and 2024, with the most likely outcome being a re-acceleration of growth driven in part by technology-led productivity gains. We continue to expect U.S. inflation to moderate, although elevated energy costs have delayed the timeline, and we believe the Federal Reserve could have scope to ease policy later in the year. Stickier inflation nonetheless remains a risk to this central view.
Outside the U.S., most developed economies are expected to remain resilient, supported by moderate growth and easing inflation, with Japan representing a notable exception as gradual policy tightening continues. That said, the conflict in the Middle East introduces upside risks to inflation in Europe, where the effects are likely to be amplified by the continent’s reliance on energy imports.
We favor a long-duration position in portfolios, particularly at the front end of the U.S. curve, as well as in select emerging markets. However, given the potential upside risk to inflation expectations, we aim to retain flexibility to add to these positions should pricing become more attractive. Credit valuations have reversed much of the weakness experienced in March and remain near the most expensive end of the historical range. We also believe dispersion across and within sectors could increase, which emphasizes the need for diversification and strong bottom-up fundamental analysis.
Given our central views, we maintain modest overweight positions across credit sectors, with a bias toward higher-quality sectors such as investment-grade corporates or higher-quality securitized assets. Alongside our long-duration theme, we prefer positioning portfolios for steeper curves, particularly in the U.S. and Germany, which we believe could provide protection in an economic slowdown or in an environment of more expansionary fiscal policy. In our currency strategy, we hold an underweight position in the U.S. dollar, although less pronounced than earlier in 2025. This position is expressed against a diversified basket of developed- and emerging-market currencies such as the euro, the Japanese yen, and the Brazilian real.
